✍️Writing & Content58🎨Image Generation71🎬Video & Animation120🎵Audio & Music100💬Chatbots & Assistants109💻Coding & Development444📈Marketing & SEO197Productivity401🎯Design & UI/UX120📊Data & Analytics126📚Education & Research55💼Business & Finance174🏥Healthcare & Wellness22🔍Search & Knowledge20🤖AI Agent Infrastructure208🛡️AI Security & Testing32🧊3D & Spatial22🔎SEO Tools113🏡Real Estate7🗃️Data Extraction104🧠ADHD & Focus Tools11🔬Research & Academia45🧩LLM APIs & Models34⚙️Automation & Workflows45🔐Security & Privacy31📊Analytics & BI55⚖️Legal & Contracts14
Listed in Coding & Development with 479 other toolsPart of 3609+ curated AI tools on AISO
Stoneforge logo

Stoneforge

Open-source orchestration for running teams of AI coding agents in parallel git worktrees

0
freeFree and open source — self-hosted, with the dashboard running locally. No paid tier is published on the site; the primary call to action is Get Started and Star on GitHub.View full pricing →

About Stoneforge

Stoneforge is an open-source orchestration layer for running several AI coding agents at once on the same repository. The failure mode it targets is specific: once you have more than one Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode session working on a project, they edit the same files on the same branch, two of them grab the same task, and you cannot see what any of them is doing without tabbing through terminals. Stoneforge fixes each of those in turn. Every worker agent runs inside its own isolated git worktree, so agents never collide on the filesystem, and a merge steward handles integration back to main — reviewing CI status and resolving conflicts as a separate role rather than leaving it to whichever agent finished first. A dispatch daemon tracks task priorities and dependencies and auto-assigns ready work to idle workers, so nothing gets double-claimed and nothing starts while it is still blocked. Over the top sits a real-time web dashboard at localhost:3457 that shows active agents, tasks in progress, merge requests awaiting review, and recent completions in one view, with a command palette for driving the whole thing. Roles are explicit — Director agents execute plans, Workers implement, Stewards review and merge — and recent versions added GitHub, Linear, and Notion sync so the task board can mirror the tracker a team already uses.

Does ChatGPT recommend your AI tool?

If you're building in Coding & Development, run a free AI-visibility scan on your own product — we ask ChatGPT across 5 prompt angles and score how often you get named. ~30 seconds, no signup, no card.

Key Features

Every worker agent runs in an isolated git worktree, eliminating cross-agent merge conflicts
Merge steward role reviews CI status and resolves conflicts before integrating to main
Dependency-aware dispatch daemon auto-assigns ready tasks to idle workers
Real-time web dashboard showing active agents, tasks, merge requests, and completions
Director / Worker / Steward role split instead of a flat pool of identical agents
GitHub, Linear, and Notion sync for the task board
Works with Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode

Stoneforge Pros & Cons

Pros

  • +Worktree isolation is the correct structural fix for parallel agents, not a coordination convention agents can ignore
  • +Free and self-hosted — no per-seat cost on top of what you already pay for model access
  • +Dependency-aware dispatch prevents the duplicated-work problem that makes naive multi-agent setups slower than one agent
  • +Dashboard gives a single place to approve merges instead of watching several terminals
  • +Agent-agnostic — works across Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode rather than locking you to one vendor

⚠️ Cons

  • Self-hosting means you operate the daemon and dashboard yourself; there is no managed option
  • Only useful once you are genuinely running multiple agents — overkill for a single-agent workflow
  • Multi-agent orchestration multiplies model spend, and Stoneforge does not reduce that
  • No published pricing or support tier, so no commercial backstop if you depend on it

Who Is Stoneforge Best For?

👤Developers already running three or more coding agents at once who keep hitting merge conflicts
👤Small teams that want a shared view of what their agents are doing
👤Anyone who wants agent orchestration self-hosted rather than in a vendor's cloud

Tags

ai-agentscoding-agentsorchestrationgit-worktreeopen-sourceself-hosted
🏷️

Is Stoneforge your tool?

This is the page buyers and AI assistants read when they look up Stoneforge. Claim your listing for $19 one-time — no subscription, nothing to cancel — and get a Featured badge, top placement in your category, and a permanent dofollow backlink. Prefer it ongoing? Monthly is one click away on the next page.

Stay updated on Coding & Development tools — join our weekly newsletter

One concise email with fresh launches, trending picks, and featured standouts.

Alternatives to Stoneforge

View all Stoneforge alternatives →

More Coding & Development tools

Agent connectivity: not yet verified