Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Mistral Small 4: Which is Better in 2026?
A comprehensive comparison of Mistral Medium 3.5 and Mistral Small 4 covering features, pricing, use cases, and which tool is the right choice for your needs.
⚡ Quick Verdict
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 if:
- →You want more affordable paid plans (from $1.5/mo)
- →You need 128b dense model (merged: instruction-following + reasoning + coding) or 77.6% on swe-bench verified (beats devstral 2 and qwen3.5 397b a17b)
Choose Mistral Small 4 if:
- →You need a broader feature set (10 features vs 9)
- →You need 119b total parameters, 6b active per token (moe: 128 experts, 4 active) or unified reasoning, vision, and coding in a single model
Mistral Medium 3.5 and Mistral Small 4 get named on this page. Does your tool?
Comparisons like this one are what ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read when someone asks which of the llm apis & models to recommend — and they can only weigh up tools they can find. Add yours to the llm apis & models category: a free listing publishes after review. Want it live in minutes with a Verified badge instead? That option is on the form, one-time, no subscription.
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Mistral Small 4: At a Glance
Pricing Comparison: Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Mistral Small 4
Understanding the pricing differences between Mistral Medium 3.5 and Mistral Small 4 is crucial for making the right choice. Here's how their plans compare side by side.
Mistral Small 4 Pricing
💡 Pricing takeaway: Both Mistral Medium 3.5 and Mistral Small 4 offer free tiers, making it easy to try before you buy. Compare the specific plans to find the best value for your use case.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Here's how every feature from Mistral Medium 3.5 and Mistral Small 4 stacks up. They share 1 features in common.
What Makes Each Tool Unique
🔵 Unique to Mistral Medium 3.5
Features available in Mistral Medium 3.5 but not in Mistral Small 4:
- ✓128B dense model (merged: instruction-following + reasoning + coding)
- ✓77.6% on SWE-Bench Verified (beats Devstral 2 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B)
- ✓91.4 on τ³-Telecom (strong agentic capabilities)
- ✓Configurable reasoning effort per request
- ✓Vision encoder trained from scratch — handles variable image sizes and aspect ratios
- ✓Open weights under modified MIT license (self-hostable on 4 GPUs)
- ✓Powers Mistral Vibe remote coding agents and Le Chat Work mode
- ✓Async cloud coding sessions with GitHub, Linear, Jira, Sentry integrations
🟣 Unique to Mistral Small 4
Features available in Mistral Small 4 but not in Mistral Medium 3.5:
- ✓119B total parameters, 6B active per token (MoE: 128 experts, 4 active)
- ✓Unified reasoning, vision, and coding in a single model
- ✓Configurable reasoning effort: reasoning_effort='none' (fast) or 'high' (deep)
- ✓Native image input support (text + vision in one model)
- ✓Apache 2.0 license — permissive commercial use, no additional restrictions
- ✓40% reduction in end-to-end latency vs Mistral Small 3
- ✓3× higher throughput vs Mistral Small 3 (throughput-optimized setup)
- ✓Beats GPT-OSS 120B on AA LCR and LiveCodeBench with shorter outputs
- ✓Runs on vLLM, llama.cpp, SGLang, and Transformers
Use Case Recommendations
Best for: Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral's first flagship merged model, released May 22, 2026. A dense 128B model with a 256k context window that handles instruction-following, reasoning, and coding in a single set of weights. Available as open weights (modified MIT license) and powers Mistral Vibe remote coding agents and Le Chat's new Work mode. SWE-Bench Verified: 77.6%. API: $1.5/M input, $7.5/M output.
Ideal use cases:
- •Teams or individuals who need 128b dense model (merged: instruction-following + reasoning + coding)
- •Teams or individuals who need 256k token context window
- •Teams or individuals who need 77.6% on swe-bench verified (beats devstral 2 and qwen3.5 397b a17b)
- •Teams or individuals who need 91.4 on τ³-telecom (strong agentic capabilities)
- •Anyone focused on mistral workflows
- •Anyone focused on llm workflows
Best for: Mistral Small 4
Mistral's first unified open-source model, released March 16, 2026. A 119B MoE model (6B active parameters per token) that merges reasoning (Magistral), multimodal vision (Pixtral), and agentic coding (Devstral) into a single Apache 2.0 model. 256k context window. 40% faster and 3× higher throughput than Mistral Small 3. Beats GPT-OSS 120B on coding and reasoning benchmarks while generating shorter outputs.
Ideal use cases:
- •Teams or individuals who need 119b total parameters, 6b active per token (moe: 128 experts, 4 active)
- •Teams or individuals who need 256k token context window
- •Teams or individuals who need unified reasoning, vision, and coding in a single model
- •Teams or individuals who need configurable reasoning effort: reasoning_effort='none' (fast) or 'high' (deep)
- •Anyone focused on mistral workflows
- •Anyone focused on llm workflows
🧩 Other LLM APIs & Models Tools to Consider
Mistral Medium 3.5 and Mistral Small 4 aren't the only options. Here are other popular tools in the same space:
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic's flagship model — stronger coding, agents, and honesty
Mistral Small 3.1
Mistral's 24B multimodal open-source model — beats GPT-4o Mini, Apache 2.0
Mistral Small 3
Mistral's 24B latency-optimized open model — faster than Llama 3.3 70B, Apache 2.0
Mistral 3
Mistral's MoE flagship + edge model family — Apache 2.0, multimodal, reasoning
North Mini Code
Cohere's open-source agentic coding model — 30B MoE, 3B active, Apache 2.0
Codestral 25.08
Mistral's low-latency code completion model — FIM, 80+ languages, 256k context
Is one of these your tool?
This page ranks for "Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Mistral Small 4" — buyers comparing the two land here, and ChatGPT and Perplexity cite it. Claim your listing for $19 one-time — no subscription, nothing to cancel — and get a Featured badge, top placement in your category, and a permanent dofollow backlink. Prefer it ongoing? Monthly is one click away on the next page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Mistral Small 4?
It depends on your needs. Mistral Medium 3.5 offers 9 key features including 128B dense model (merged: instruction-following + reasoning + coding) and 256k token context window, while Mistral Small 4 provides 10 features including 119B total parameters, 6B active per token (MoE: 128 experts, 4 active) and 256k token context window. Mistral Medium 3.5 uses a freemium model with a free tier, while Mistral Small 4 is freemium with free access available. Choose based on which features and pricing model align with your requirements.
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 cheaper than Mistral Small 4?
Mistral Small 4 doesn't have standard paid plans, while Mistral Medium 3.5 starts at $1.5/month. Both tools offer free tiers, so you can try each before committing. Always check the official websites for the most current pricing.
Can I use Mistral Medium 3.5 and Mistral Small 4 together?
Yes, many users combine Mistral Medium 3.5 and Mistral Small 4 in their workflow. Mistral Medium 3.5 excels at 128b dense model (merged: instruction-following + reasoning + coding), while Mistral Small 4 shines with 119b total parameters, 6b active per token (moe: 128 experts, 4 active). Using both allows you to leverage the strengths of each tool, though this means managing two subscriptions — though free tiers can help manage costs.
What's the main difference between Mistral Medium 3.5 and Mistral Small 4?
While both are llm apis & models tools, Mistral Medium 3.5 emphasizes 128b dense model (merged: instruction-following + reasoning + coding), whereas Mistral Small 4 is known for 119b total parameters, 6b active per token (moe: 128 experts, 4 active). The best choice depends on your specific workflow and feature priorities.
Learn More
📬 Get the best new AI tools delivered weekly
One concise email with fresh launches, trending picks, and featured standouts.