DepScope vs Qualmly: Which is Better in 2026?
A comprehensive comparison of DepScope and Qualmly covering features, pricing, use cases, and which tool is the right choice for your needs.
⚡ Quick Verdict
Choose DepScope if:
- →You need a broader feature set (8 features vs 6)
- →You need hallucination guard verifies packages against live registries in 19 ecosystems or typosquat detection by levenshtein distance to popular package names
Choose Qualmly if:
- →You need scans a live app url or pasted html across eight test categories or vibe-coded preset for leaked client keys, missing rls and open admin routes
ChatGPT already recommends DepScope or Qualmly. Does it recommend yours?
If you're building an AI tool, run a free AI-visibility scan on your own product — we ask ChatGPT across 5 prompt angles and score how often you get named. ~30 seconds, no signup, no card.
DepScope vs Qualmly: At a Glance
Pricing Comparison: DepScope vs Qualmly
Understanding the pricing differences between DepScope and Qualmly is crucial for making the right choice. Here's how their plans compare side by side.
Qualmly Pricing
💡 Pricing takeaway: Both DepScope and Qualmly offer free tiers, making it easy to try before you buy. Compare the specific plans to find the best value for your use case.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Here's how every feature from DepScope and Qualmly stacks up.
What Makes Each Tool Unique
🔵 Unique to DepScope
Features available in DepScope but not in Qualmly:
- ✓Hallucination guard verifies packages against live registries in 19 ecosystems
- ✓Typosquat detection by Levenshtein distance to popular package names
- ✓Live CVE intel from OSV, CISA KEV, EPSS, and the OpenSSF malicious feed
- ✓Severity, fix version, and migration path returned in one call
- ✓~300-token briefs replacing 4–8k tokens of scraping per decision (−74%)
- ✓8.5M packages, 19 ecosystems, 22 MCP tools
- ✓Remote MCP with zero install in Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Windsurf
- ✓Browser manifest scan plus a published 10-model hallucination benchmark
🟣 Unique to Qualmly
Features available in Qualmly but not in DepScope:
- ✓Scans a live app URL or pasted HTML across eight test categories
- ✓Vibe-coded preset for leaked client keys, missing RLS and open admin routes
- ✓Opt-in active Supabase RLS probe, read-only and rate-capped
- ✓Explicit ownership attestation required before active probing
- ✓Paste-code review with UAT scenarios and one-click fixes
- ✓Runs on your own Claude key, no signup needed
Use Case Recommendations
Best for: DepScope
DepScope is a free MCP server that screens every package an AI agent suggests before it reaches npm install. It targets three specific failure modes. The first is hallucination: LLMs invent plausible-sounding package names, and DepScope verifies each one against live registries across 19 ecosystems and flags typosquats by Levenshtein distance to popular packages — the exact mechanism attackers rely on when they register a name a model is likely to hallucinate. The second is vulnerability exposure, covered by live lookups against OSV, CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list, EPSS scores, the OpenSSF malicious-package feed, and a deprecated-package index, returning severity, fix version, and migration path in one call. The third is token cost: pre-curated briefs of roughly 300 tokens replace the four-to-eight thousand tokens an agent would otherwise burn scraping registry and CVE pages per decision, a reported 74% reduction. It covers 8.5 million packages across 19 ecosystems — npm, PyPI, Cargo, Go, Composer, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, pub, hex, Swift, CPAN, Hackage, CRAN, conda, Homebrew, JSR, and Julia — with 22 MCP tools, no auth, no API key, and no rate limit. Remote MCP works out of the box in Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Windsurf, with a curl one-liner for everything else, and the SDKs are open source. There is also a browser paste-a-manifest scan and a published ten-model hallucination benchmark.
Ideal use cases:
- •Teams or individuals who need hallucination guard verifies packages against live registries in 19 ecosystems
- •Teams or individuals who need typosquat detection by levenshtein distance to popular package names
- •Teams or individuals who need live cve intel from osv, cisa kev, epss, and the openssf malicious feed
- •Teams or individuals who need severity, fix version, and migration path returned in one call
- •Anyone focused on mcp workflows
- •Anyone focused on supply-chain workflows
Best for: Qualmly
Qualmly is an AI reviewer aimed specifically at applications shipped out of Lovable, Bolt, v0, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Windsurf, Replit and Webflow — the class of app where nobody on the team is necessarily an engineer and the failure modes are consistent enough to check for by name. You paste an app URL, or the raw HTML when the app sits behind a login or blocks crawlers, pick the app type, and it returns findings across eight test categories in plain English in about thirty seconds. The Vibe-Coded App preset targets the specific patterns AI code generators produce: missing Supabase row-level security, secret keys leaked into the client bundle, unauthenticated endpoints, exposed admin routes and boilerplate CORS/CSRF mistakes. There is also an opt-in active Supabase RLS probe that goes past passive recon and actually attempts read-only queries against the Supabase project found in the bundle to confirm whether RLS is enforced — capped at ten requests, 100 ms apart, read-only, and gated behind an explicit ownership attestation with a clear warning that running it against someone else's app may breach their terms of service or unauthorised-access law. Beyond the scanner there is a code-review surface where you paste JavaScript, React, HTML or CSS and get a UAT and best-practice audit with one-click inserts, plus a monitoring tab. It runs as a single HTML file against your own Claude key, and the QA check is free.
Ideal use cases:
- •Teams or individuals who need scans a live app url or pasted html across eight test categories
- •Teams or individuals who need vibe-coded preset for leaked client keys, missing rls and open admin routes
- •Teams or individuals who need opt-in active supabase rls probe, read-only and rate-capped
- •Teams or individuals who need explicit ownership attestation required before active probing
- •Anyone focused on vibe-coding workflows
- •Anyone focused on supabase-rls workflows
🛡️ Other AI Security & Testing Tools to Consider
DepScope and Qualmly aren't the only options. Here are other popular tools in the same space:
Lineation
Security control plane for AI agents — zero-trust agent identity, LLM and MCP gateways, policy-as-code, and prompt-injection defense
Axtary
Payload-bound authorization for AI agents — human approval is cryptographically tied to the exact action, so a changed payload is denied
Tracecat
Open-source SOAR for AI-native security teams — agents, cases, and workflows with human approval gates
Trestle
Local secret scanner with an MCP server so coding agents check their own output
Agentmetry
Local, open-source flight recorder that tags AI agent activity with MITRE ATT&CK
ZeroLeaks
Continuous AI red teaming for agents, endpoints and MCP tools, with unlimited scans on every plan
Is one of these your tool?
This page ranks for "DepScope vs Qualmly" — buyers comparing the two land here, and ChatGPT and Perplexity cite it. Claim your listing for $19 one-time — no subscription, nothing to cancel — and get a Featured badge, top placement in your category, and a permanent dofollow backlink. Prefer it ongoing? Monthly is one click away on the next page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is DepScope better than Qualmly?
It depends on your needs. DepScope offers 8 key features including Hallucination guard verifies packages against live registries in 19 ecosystems and Typosquat detection by Levenshtein distance to popular package names, while Qualmly provides 6 features including Scans a live app URL or pasted HTML across eight test categories and Vibe-coded preset for leaked client keys, missing RLS and open admin routes. DepScope uses a free model with a free tier, while Qualmly is free with free access available. Choose based on which features and pricing model align with your requirements.
Is DepScope cheaper than Qualmly?
DepScope doesn't have standard paid plans, while Qualmly starts at The QA check is free and runs against your own Claude API key; the UAT and code-quality surface is in free beta. No paid tier is published at the time of verification.. Both tools offer free tiers, so you can try each before committing. Always check the official websites for the most current pricing.
Can I use DepScope and Qualmly together?
Yes, many users combine DepScope and Qualmly in their workflow. DepScope excels at hallucination guard verifies packages against live registries in 19 ecosystems, while Qualmly shines with scans a live app url or pasted html across eight test categories. Using both allows you to leverage the strengths of each tool, though this means managing two subscriptions — though free tiers can help manage costs.
What's the main difference between DepScope and Qualmly?
While both are ai security & testing tools, DepScope emphasizes hallucination guard verifies packages against live registries in 19 ecosystems, whereas Qualmly is known for scans a live app url or pasted html across eight test categories. The best choice depends on your specific workflow and feature priorities.
Learn More
📬 Get the best new AI tools delivered weekly
One concise email with fresh launches, trending picks, and featured standouts.