DepScope vs ZeroLeaks: Which is Better in 2026?
A comprehensive comparison of DepScope and ZeroLeaks covering features, pricing, use cases, and which tool is the right choice for your needs.
⚡ Quick Verdict
Choose DepScope if:
- →You want a free tier to get started without commitment
- →You need a broader feature set (8 features vs 6)
- →You need hallucination guard verifies packages against live registries in 19 ecosystems or typosquat detection by levenshtein distance to popular package names
Choose ZeroLeaks if:
- →You want more affordable paid plans (from $79/mo)
- →You need attack agents that plan, execute and validate in minutes or probe library built from real documented exploits
ChatGPT already recommends DepScope or ZeroLeaks. Does it recommend yours?
If you're building an AI tool, run a free AI-visibility scan on your own product — we ask ChatGPT across 5 prompt angles and score how often you get named. ~30 seconds, no signup, no card.
DepScope vs ZeroLeaks: At a Glance
Pricing Comparison: DepScope vs ZeroLeaks
Understanding the pricing differences between DepScope and ZeroLeaks is crucial for making the right choice. Here's how their plans compare side by side.
ZeroLeaks Pricing
💡 Pricing takeaway: DepScope has an edge with a free tier, letting you start without commitment. Compare the specific plans to find the best value for your use case.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Here's how every feature from DepScope and ZeroLeaks stacks up.
What Makes Each Tool Unique
🔵 Unique to DepScope
Features available in DepScope but not in ZeroLeaks:
- ✓Hallucination guard verifies packages against live registries in 19 ecosystems
- ✓Typosquat detection by Levenshtein distance to popular package names
- ✓Live CVE intel from OSV, CISA KEV, EPSS, and the OpenSSF malicious feed
- ✓Severity, fix version, and migration path returned in one call
- ✓~300-token briefs replacing 4–8k tokens of scraping per decision (−74%)
- ✓8.5M packages, 19 ecosystems, 22 MCP tools
- ✓Remote MCP with zero install in Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Windsurf
- ✓Browser manifest scan plus a published 10-model hallucination benchmark
🟣 Unique to ZeroLeaks
Features available in ZeroLeaks but not in DepScope:
- ✓Attack agents that plan, execute and validate in minutes
- ✓Probe library built from real documented exploits
- ✓Coverage across prompts, tools, MCP servers and RAG
- ✓GitHub PR merge gates on behaviour changes
- ✓Guided remediation with hardening validation
- ✓Severity-ranked, exportable audit-ready reports
Use Case Recommendations
Best for: DepScope
DepScope is a free MCP server that screens every package an AI agent suggests before it reaches npm install. It targets three specific failure modes. The first is hallucination: LLMs invent plausible-sounding package names, and DepScope verifies each one against live registries across 19 ecosystems and flags typosquats by Levenshtein distance to popular packages — the exact mechanism attackers rely on when they register a name a model is likely to hallucinate. The second is vulnerability exposure, covered by live lookups against OSV, CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list, EPSS scores, the OpenSSF malicious-package feed, and a deprecated-package index, returning severity, fix version, and migration path in one call. The third is token cost: pre-curated briefs of roughly 300 tokens replace the four-to-eight thousand tokens an agent would otherwise burn scraping registry and CVE pages per decision, a reported 74% reduction. It covers 8.5 million packages across 19 ecosystems — npm, PyPI, Cargo, Go, Composer, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, pub, hex, Swift, CPAN, Hackage, CRAN, conda, Homebrew, JSR, and Julia — with 22 MCP tools, no auth, no API key, and no rate limit. Remote MCP works out of the box in Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Windsurf, with a curl one-liner for everything else, and the SDKs are open source. There is also a browser paste-a-manifest scan and a published ten-model hallucination benchmark.
Ideal use cases:
- •Teams or individuals who need hallucination guard verifies packages against live registries in 19 ecosystems
- •Teams or individuals who need typosquat detection by levenshtein distance to popular package names
- •Teams or individuals who need live cve intel from osv, cisa kev, epss, and the openssf malicious feed
- •Teams or individuals who need severity, fix version, and migration path returned in one call
- •Anyone focused on mcp workflows
- •Anyone focused on supply-chain workflows
Best for: ZeroLeaks
ZeroLeaks runs continuous red-team scans against AI agents, endpoints and MCP tools, looking for prompt injection, data leakage and unsafe actions — then re-tests to verify each fix actually closed the hole. You point it at a system prompt, a live agent endpoint or a set of tool definitions, and a team of specialised attack agents plans, executes and validates attacks in minutes. The probe library is the differentiator: it is grounded in thousands of documented real-world prompt leaks and jailbreaks catalogued by the team behind a 100k-plus-star repository, rather than a synthetic checklist that gets stale the week after it ships. Coverage spans prompts, tool calls, MCP servers, RAG pipelines and extended multi-turn conversations, which is where a lot of injection actually lands. The CI/CD path is what makes it a testing tool rather than an audit: connect a repository and every pull request that changes agent behaviour gets scanned, with findings posted as checks and merge gates so risk cannot reach production silently. Every finding ships with reproducible evidence, a severity ranking and guided remediation, plus hardening validation to prove the vulnerability is closed rather than merely flagged. Reports export to PDF for security and compliance review. The pricing stance is unusual and deliberate: scans are unlimited on every plan, so testing more often never costs more — the meter is on seats and features, not diligence. Pro, Team and Business all check out self-serve with no demo wall.
Ideal use cases:
- •Teams or individuals who need attack agents that plan, execute and validate in minutes
- •Teams or individuals who need probe library built from real documented exploits
- •Teams or individuals who need coverage across prompts, tools, mcp servers and rag
- •Teams or individuals who need github pr merge gates on behaviour changes
- •Anyone focused on security workflows
- •Anyone focused on red-teaming workflows
🛡️ Other AI Security & Testing Tools to Consider
DepScope and ZeroLeaks aren't the only options. Here are other popular tools in the same space:
Lineation
Security control plane for AI agents — zero-trust agent identity, LLM and MCP gateways, policy-as-code, and prompt-injection defense
Axtary
Payload-bound authorization for AI agents — human approval is cryptographically tied to the exact action, so a changed payload is denied
Tracecat
Open-source SOAR for AI-native security teams — agents, cases, and workflows with human approval gates
Trestle
Local secret scanner with an MCP server so coding agents check their own output
Agentmetry
Local, open-source flight recorder that tags AI agent activity with MITRE ATT&CK
Bot Butcher
LLM-based spam classification API for contact forms — a reCAPTCHA alternative with no visitor friction
Is one of these your tool?
This page ranks for "DepScope vs ZeroLeaks" — buyers comparing the two land here, and ChatGPT and Perplexity cite it. Claim your listing for $19 one-time — no subscription, nothing to cancel — and get a Featured badge, top placement in your category, and a permanent dofollow backlink. Prefer it ongoing? Monthly is one click away on the next page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is DepScope better than ZeroLeaks?
It depends on your needs. DepScope offers 8 key features including Hallucination guard verifies packages against live registries in 19 ecosystems and Typosquat detection by Levenshtein distance to popular package names, while ZeroLeaks provides 6 features including Attack agents that plan, execute and validate in minutes and Probe library built from real documented exploits. DepScope uses a free model with a free tier, while ZeroLeaks is paid. Choose based on which features and pricing model align with your requirements.
Is DepScope cheaper than ZeroLeaks?
DepScope doesn't have standard paid plans, while ZeroLeaks starts at $79/month. DepScope offers a free tier, making it easier to get started. Always check the official websites for the most current pricing.
Can I use DepScope and ZeroLeaks together?
Yes, many users combine DepScope and ZeroLeaks in their workflow. DepScope excels at hallucination guard verifies packages against live registries in 19 ecosystems, while ZeroLeaks shines with attack agents that plan, execute and validate in minutes. Using both allows you to leverage the strengths of each tool, though this means managing two subscriptions — though free tiers can help manage costs.
What's the main difference between DepScope and ZeroLeaks?
While both are ai security & testing tools, DepScope emphasizes hallucination guard verifies packages against live registries in 19 ecosystems, whereas ZeroLeaks is known for attack agents that plan, execute and validate in minutes. The best choice depends on your specific workflow and feature priorities.
Learn More
📬 Get the best new AI tools delivered weekly
One concise email with fresh launches, trending picks, and featured standouts.