โœ๏ธWriting & Content23๐ŸŽจImage Generation32๐ŸŽฌVideo & Animation64๐ŸŽตAudio & Music49๐Ÿ’ฌChatbots & Assistants36๐Ÿ’ปCoding & Development155๐Ÿ“ˆMarketing & SEO52โšกProductivity139๐ŸŽฏDesign & UI/UX52๐Ÿ“ŠData & Analytics36๐Ÿ“šEducation & Research24๐Ÿ’ผBusiness & Finance50๐ŸฅHealthcare & Wellness18๐Ÿ”Search & Knowledge14๐Ÿค–AI Agent Infrastructure25๐Ÿ›ก๏ธAI Security & Testing2๐ŸงŠ3D & Spatial14๐Ÿ”ŽSEO Tools5๐ŸกReal Estate4๐Ÿ—ƒ๏ธData Extraction3๐Ÿง ADHD & Focus Tools9
Codestral 25.08 logoCodestral 25.08
vs
Devstral 2 logoDevstral 2

Codestral 25.08 vs Devstral 2: Which is Better in 2026?

A comprehensive comparison of Codestral 25.08 and Devstral 2 covering features, pricing, use cases, and which tool is the right choice for your needs.

โšก Quick Verdict

Choose Codestral 25.08 if:

  • โ†’You want more affordable paid plans (from $0.3/mo)
  • โ†’You need fill-in-the-middle (fim) support for inline ide code completion or 256k token context window for large codebases

Choose Devstral 2 if:

  • โ†’You need a broader feature set (12 features vs 10)
  • โ†’You need 72.2% on swe-bench verified (devstral 2, 123b) โ€” state-of-the-art among open-weight models at launch or 68.0% on swe-bench verified (devstral small 2, 24b) โ€” matches models 5ร— its size

ChatGPT already recommends Codestral 25.08 or Devstral 2. Does it recommend yours?

If you're building an AI tool, run a free AI-visibility scan on your own product โ€” we ask ChatGPT across 5 prompt angles and score how often you get named. ~30 seconds, no signup, no card.

Codestral 25.08 vs Devstral 2: At a Glance

Attribute
Codestral 25.08
Devstral 2
Pricing Model
Paid
Freemium
Starting Price
Free plan + paid from $0.3/month
Devstral 2 (123B) and Devstral Small 2 (24B) are currently free to use via the Mistral API (console.mistral.ai). Open weights: Devstral 2 ships under a modified MIT license; Devstral Small 2 under Apache 2.0. Self-hosting on compatible hardware is supported. Enterprise pricing available for on-prem deployments.
Free Tier
โœ“ Yes
โœ“ Yes
Category
llm-apis
llm-apis
Features Count
10 features
12 features
Shared Features
0 features in common

Pricing Comparison: Codestral 25.08 vs Devstral 2

Understanding the pricing differences between Codestral 25.08 and Devstral 2 is crucial for making the right choice. Here's how their plans compare side by side.

Codestral 25.08 Pricing

Premier (proprietary) modelSee website
API pricing:$0.3/month
Starter$0.9/month
Free$0forever
View full Codestral 25.08 pricing โ†’

Devstral 2 Pricing

EnterpriseCustom
View full Devstral 2 pricing โ†’

๐Ÿ’ก Pricing takeaway: Both Codestral 25.08 and Devstral 2 offer free tiers, making it easy to try before you buy. Compare the specific plans to find the best value for your use case.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Here's how every feature from Codestral 25.08 and Devstral 2 stacks up.

Feature
Codestral 25.08
Devstral 2
Fill-in-the-middle (FIM) support for inline IDE code completion
โœ“
โœ—
256k token context window for large codebases
โœ“
โœ—
80+ programming language support
โœ“
โœ—
Low-latency inference optimized for real-time completion
โœ“
โœ—
Code correction and bug-fix generation
โœ“
โœ—
Test generation from function signatures and docstrings
โœ“
โœ—
Native integrations: VS Code (Continue.dev), JetBrains, Jupyter, neovim, Emacs
โœ“
โœ—
Model ID: codestral-latest / codestral-25-08
โœ“
โœ—
$0.3/M input ยท $0.9/M output
โœ“
โœ—
Successor to Codestral 25.01 with improved FIM accuracy and multi-language performance
โœ“
โœ—
72.2% on SWE-bench Verified (Devstral 2, 123B) โ€” state-of-the-art among open-weight models at launch
โœ—
โœ“
68.0% on SWE-bench Verified (Devstral Small 2, 24B) โ€” matches models 5ร— its size
โœ—
โœ“
256K context window โ€” supports full codebase ingestion and multi-file edits
โœ—
โœ“
Up to 7ร— more cost-efficient than Claude Sonnet on real-world coding tasks (Mistral human evals)
โœ—
โœ“
42.8% win rate vs. 28.6% loss rate against DeepSeek V3.2 in independent human evaluation via Cline
โœ—
โœ“
Mistral Vibe CLI: open-source terminal agent for autonomous end-to-end code automation
โœ—
โœ“
Multi-file editing: tracks framework dependencies, detects failures, retries with corrections
โœ—
โœ“
Fine-tuning support for specific languages or enterprise codebases
โœ—
โœ“
Devstral 2: modified MIT license โ€” Devstral Small 2: Apache 2.0
โœ—
โœ“
5ร— smaller than DeepSeek V3.2 (123B vs ~671B) at comparable benchmark performance
โœ—
โœ“
Devstral Small 2 runs locally on consumer hardware โ€” single H100 or equivalent
โœ—
โœ“
Compatible with Cline, Continue, and other VS Code coding agent integrations
โœ—
โœ“

What Makes Each Tool Unique

๐Ÿ”ต Unique to Codestral 25.08

Features available in Codestral 25.08 but not in Devstral 2:

  • โœ“Fill-in-the-middle (FIM) support for inline IDE code completion
  • โœ“256k token context window for large codebases
  • โœ“80+ programming language support
  • โœ“Low-latency inference optimized for real-time completion
  • โœ“Code correction and bug-fix generation
  • โœ“Test generation from function signatures and docstrings
  • โœ“Native integrations: VS Code (Continue.dev), JetBrains, Jupyter, neovim, Emacs
  • โœ“Model ID: codestral-latest / codestral-25-08
  • โœ“$0.3/M input ยท $0.9/M output
  • โœ“Successor to Codestral 25.01 with improved FIM accuracy and multi-language performance

๐ŸŸฃ Unique to Devstral 2

Features available in Devstral 2 but not in Codestral 25.08:

  • โœ“72.2% on SWE-bench Verified (Devstral 2, 123B) โ€” state-of-the-art among open-weight models at launch
  • โœ“68.0% on SWE-bench Verified (Devstral Small 2, 24B) โ€” matches models 5ร— its size
  • โœ“256K context window โ€” supports full codebase ingestion and multi-file edits
  • โœ“Up to 7ร— more cost-efficient than Claude Sonnet on real-world coding tasks (Mistral human evals)
  • โœ“42.8% win rate vs. 28.6% loss rate against DeepSeek V3.2 in independent human evaluation via Cline
  • โœ“Mistral Vibe CLI: open-source terminal agent for autonomous end-to-end code automation
  • โœ“Multi-file editing: tracks framework dependencies, detects failures, retries with corrections
  • โœ“Fine-tuning support for specific languages or enterprise codebases
  • โœ“Devstral 2: modified MIT license โ€” Devstral Small 2: Apache 2.0
  • โœ“5ร— smaller than DeepSeek V3.2 (123B vs ~671B) at comparable benchmark performance
  • โœ“Devstral Small 2 runs locally on consumer hardware โ€” single H100 or equivalent
  • โœ“Compatible with Cline, Continue, and other VS Code coding agent integrations

Use Case Recommendations

Best for: Codestral 25.08

Mistral's dedicated code completion model, updated August 2025. Optimized for low-latency, high-frequency coding tasks โ€” fill-in-the-middle (FIM), inline completion, code correction, and test generation. Supports 80+ programming languages. 256k context window. API: $0.3/M input, $0.9/M output. Integrates natively with VS Code, JetBrains, Jupyter, neovim, and Emacs.

Ideal use cases:

  • โ€ขTeams or individuals who need fill-in-the-middle (fim) support for inline ide code completion
  • โ€ขTeams or individuals who need 256k token context window for large codebases
  • โ€ขTeams or individuals who need 80+ programming language support
  • โ€ขTeams or individuals who need low-latency inference optimized for real-time completion
  • โ€ขAnyone focused on mistral workflows
  • โ€ขAnyone focused on llm workflows
Try Codestral 25.08 โ†’

Best for: Devstral 2

Mistral AI's next-generation open-weight coding model family, released December 9, 2025. Devstral 2 is a 123B-parameter dense transformer with a 256K context window, achieving 72.2% on SWE-bench Verified under a modified MIT license โ€” currently free via the Mistral API. Devstral Small 2 (24B, Apache 2.0) scores 68.0% on SWE-bench Verified and runs on consumer hardware. Up to 7ร— more cost-efficient than Claude Sonnet at real-world coding tasks per Mistral's human evaluations. Ships alongside Mistral Vibe, an open-source terminal CLI for end-to-end code automation.

Ideal use cases:

  • โ€ขTeams or individuals who need 72.2% on swe-bench verified (devstral 2, 123b) โ€” state-of-the-art among open-weight models at launch
  • โ€ขTeams or individuals who need 68.0% on swe-bench verified (devstral small 2, 24b) โ€” matches models 5ร— its size
  • โ€ขTeams or individuals who need 256k context window โ€” supports full codebase ingestion and multi-file edits
  • โ€ขTeams or individuals who need up to 7ร— more cost-efficient than claude sonnet on real-world coding tasks (mistral human evals)
  • โ€ขAnyone focused on mistral workflows
  • โ€ขAnyone focused on coding model workflows
Try Devstral 2 โ†’

๐Ÿ”ง Other llm-apis Tools to Consider

Codestral 25.08 and Devstral 2 aren't the only options. Here are other popular tools in the same space:

๐Ÿท๏ธ

Is one of these your tool?

This page ranks for "Codestral 25.08 vs Devstral 2" โ€” buyers comparing the two land here, and ChatGPT and Perplexity cite it. Claim your listing to get a Featured badge, top placement in your category, and a permanent dofollow backlink โ€” from $19/mo, cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Codestral 25.08 better than Devstral 2?

It depends on your needs. Codestral 25.08 offers 10 key features including Fill-in-the-middle (FIM) support for inline IDE code completion and 256k token context window for large codebases, while Devstral 2 provides 12 features including 72.2% on SWE-bench Verified (Devstral 2, 123B) โ€” state-of-the-art among open-weight models at launch and 68.0% on SWE-bench Verified (Devstral Small 2, 24B) โ€” matches models 5ร— its size. Codestral 25.08 uses a paid model with a free tier, while Devstral 2 is freemium with free access available. Choose based on which features and pricing model align with your requirements.

Is Codestral 25.08 cheaper than Devstral 2?

Devstral 2 doesn't have standard paid plans, while Codestral 25.08 starts at $0.3/month. Both tools offer free tiers, so you can try each before committing. Always check the official websites for the most current pricing.

Can I use Codestral 25.08 and Devstral 2 together?

Yes, many users combine Codestral 25.08 and Devstral 2 in their workflow. Codestral 25.08 excels at fill-in-the-middle (fim) support for inline ide code completion, while Devstral 2 shines with 72.2% on swe-bench verified (devstral 2, 123b) โ€” state-of-the-art among open-weight models at launch. Using both allows you to leverage the strengths of each tool, though this means managing two subscriptions โ€” though free tiers can help manage costs.

What's the main difference between Codestral 25.08 and Devstral 2?

While both are llm-apis tools, Codestral 25.08 emphasizes fill-in-the-middle (fim) support for inline ide code completion, whereas Devstral 2 is known for 72.2% on swe-bench verified (devstral 2, 123b) โ€” state-of-the-art among open-weight models at launch. The best choice depends on your specific workflow and feature priorities.

Learn More

Related Comparisons

๐Ÿ“ฌ Get the best new AI tools delivered weekly

One concise email with fresh launches, trending picks, and featured standouts.