attestd vs getdebug: Which is Better in 2026?
A comprehensive comparison of attestd and getdebug covering features, pricing, use cases, and which tool is the right choice for your needs.
⚡ Quick Verdict
Choose attestd if:
- →You want more affordable paid plans (from $19.99/mo)
- →You need risk_state: nvd-derived vulnerability classification (none → critical) or supply_chain.compromised: malicious-publish flag independent of cve history
Choose getdebug if:
- →You need a broader feature set (7 features vs 6)
- →You need fixes delivered as validated pull requests, not just findings or deterministic detectors for secrets, dependency cves, weak crypto and cors
ChatGPT already recommends attestd or getdebug. Does it recommend yours?
If you're building an AI tool, run a free AI-visibility scan on your own product — we ask ChatGPT across 5 prompt angles and score how often you get named. ~30 seconds, no signup, no card.
attestd vs getdebug: At a Glance
Pricing Comparison: attestd vs getdebug
Understanding the pricing differences between attestd and getdebug is crucial for making the right choice. Here's how their plans compare side by side.
getdebug Pricing
💡 Pricing takeaway: Both attestd and getdebug offer free tiers, making it easy to try before you buy. Compare the specific plans to find the best value for your use case.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Here's how every feature from attestd and getdebug stacks up.
What Makes Each Tool Unique
🔵 Unique to attestd
Features available in attestd but not in getdebug:
- ✓risk_state: NVD-derived vulnerability classification (none → critical)
- ✓supply_chain.compromised: malicious-publish flag independent of CVE history
- ✓typosquat: package-name integrity including AI-hallucinated package names
- ✓No code or repository access required
- ✓Python SDK and a documented curl quickstart
- ✓Free tier at 1,000 calls/month with the full response schema
🟣 Unique to getdebug
Features available in getdebug but not in attestd:
- ✓Fixes delivered as validated pull requests, not just findings
- ✓Deterministic detectors for secrets, dependency CVEs, weak crypto and CORS
- ✓Model-powered SAST and AI-application detectors
- ✓Symbol-level dependency reachability via govulncheck on Pro
- ✓Bring-your-own-LLM key on the free tier, included model access on paid
- ✓Slack, Jira and Linear integrations with a ticket per high/critical finding
- ✓Automatic analyze-on-push with continuous tracking
Use Case Recommendations
Best for: attestd
attestd is a software-risk API designed to be called by CI/CD pipelines and by AI coding agents, which is a narrower and more interesting brief than a general vulnerability scanner. One request against a package name and version returns three signals that the company insists are independent by design: risk_state, an NVD-derived vulnerability classification with values from none through critical; supply_chain.compromised, a malicious-publish flag that is deliberately not derived from CVE history, so a package can return no known vulnerabilities and still be flagged as compromised; and typosquat, a package-name integrity check that catches both classic typosquats and names an LLM invented that never existed. That third signal is the one built specifically for the agent era — a coding agent that hallucinates a dependency name will happily install whatever squatter registered it, and a scanner that only scores known-good packages misses the failure mode entirely. The design principle stated throughout is determinism: NVD, CISA KEV and OSV all publish machine-readable data, but none of them yield a single condition a pipeline can branch on without interpretation, so attestd does the normalisation and returns something a script can act on. No repository or code access is required, there is a Python SDK, and the free tier is genuinely usable for evaluation and personal automation.
Ideal use cases:
- •Teams or individuals who need risk_state: nvd-derived vulnerability classification (none → critical)
- •Teams or individuals who need supply_chain.compromised: malicious-publish flag independent of cve history
- •Teams or individuals who need typosquat: package-name integrity including ai-hallucinated package names
- •Teams or individuals who need no code or repository access required
- •Anyone focused on security workflows
- •Anyone focused on api workflows
Best for: getdebug
getdebug is an application-security scanner whose output is a pull request rather than a findings dashboard, and its detector mix reflects a sharp distinction between two classes of problem. Deterministic detectors — exposed secrets, dependency CVEs, weak cryptography, permissive CORS — produce fixes that can be generated and shipped without a model in the loop, and those PRs are unlimited on paid plans. Model-powered detectors covering SAST and AI-application-specific vulnerability classes need an LLM, and here the licensing is unusually generous: on the free tier you run them on your own LLM key with no seat charge, and on paid tiers a monthly allowance of AI-assisted fixes is included with no key needed. Reachability analysis is the other differentiator and it is tiered honestly: import-level reachability on Free, upgraded to symbol-level via govulncheck on Pro, which is the difference between 'this CVE exists in a package you import' and 'this CVE is in a function your code actually calls' — the single biggest source of noise in dependency scanning. Integrations post scan summaries into Slack, Jira and Linear and open a ticket per new high or critical finding. Billing is per developer with the first seat free on paid plans, and pending invitations and non-members are explicitly not billed, which removes a common source of surprise invoices.
Ideal use cases:
- •Teams or individuals who need fixes delivered as validated pull requests, not just findings
- •Teams or individuals who need deterministic detectors for secrets, dependency cves, weak crypto and cors
- •Teams or individuals who need model-powered sast and ai-application detectors
- •Teams or individuals who need symbol-level dependency reachability via govulncheck on pro
- •Anyone focused on sast workflows
- •Anyone focused on security-scanning workflows
🔐 Other Security & Privacy Tools to Consider
attestd and getdebug aren't the only options. Here are other popular tools in the same space:
Darktrace
AI cybersecurity with autonomous response
CrowdStrike Falcon
AI endpoint security and threat intelligence
Snyk
Developer security with AI vulnerability detection
GitGuardian
Automated secrets detection in code
Wiz
Cloud security with AI risk prioritization
ZeroDrift
Compliance firewall that validates, rewrites or blocks every AI output before it reaches anyone
Is one of these your tool?
This page ranks for "attestd vs getdebug" — buyers comparing the two land here, and ChatGPT and Perplexity cite it. Claim your listing for $19 one-time — no subscription, nothing to cancel — and get a Featured badge, top placement in your category, and a permanent dofollow backlink. Prefer it ongoing? Monthly is one click away on the next page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is attestd better than getdebug?
It depends on your needs. attestd offers 6 key features including risk_state: NVD-derived vulnerability classification (none → critical) and supply_chain.compromised: malicious-publish flag independent of CVE history, while getdebug provides 7 features including Fixes delivered as validated pull requests, not just findings and Deterministic detectors for secrets, dependency CVEs, weak crypto and CORS. attestd uses a freemium model with a free tier, while getdebug is freemium with free access available. Choose based on which features and pricing model align with your requirements.
Is attestd cheaper than getdebug?
attestd is cheaper, starting at $19.99/month compared to getdebug's $39/year. Both tools offer free tiers, so you can try each before committing. Always check the official websites for the most current pricing.
Can I use attestd and getdebug together?
Yes, many users combine attestd and getdebug in their workflow. attestd excels at risk_state: nvd-derived vulnerability classification (none → critical), while getdebug shines with fixes delivered as validated pull requests, not just findings. Using both allows you to leverage the strengths of each tool, though this means managing two subscriptions — though free tiers can help manage costs.
What's the main difference between attestd and getdebug?
While both are security & privacy tools, attestd emphasizes risk_state: nvd-derived vulnerability classification (none → critical), whereas getdebug is known for fixes delivered as validated pull requests, not just findings. The best choice depends on your specific workflow and feature priorities.
Learn More
📬 Get the best new AI tools delivered weekly
One concise email with fresh launches, trending picks, and featured standouts.